Run Jen! Run!

Jennifer Aniston is Adam Sandler’s ‘Pretend Wife’
Shared via AddThis

I just watched the last five minutes of “I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry”. I’m not proud of it. I was waiting for an episode of “L & O: SVU” to start on USA, I swear. In those five minutes, not only could I tell that this is an absolutely dreadful film (well to be honest I could tell that the first time I saw it advertised on television,) but I’m sitting here completely stupified over the vision of Rob Schneider’s horrific White Guy-as-an-Asian Stereoytype & Lance Bass singing a George Michael song as a duet with a Tony Orlando look-alike.

As stated in the article above, this dreck was directed by Dennis Dugan, who will be directing the next steaming Adam Sandler pile, this time allegedly dragging Jennifer Aniston along for the ride.

Normally, I wouldn’t give a rat’s ass how Ms. Aniston chooses to handle her career. In fact, until she made next year’s release, “The Bounty” with Gerard Butler, she didn’t rate a blip on my radar. Because of that, however, I recently watched “Management” and “The Good Girl”, both of which indicate there is more to JA than an impeccably highlighted blonde rom-com staple on the hunt for the perfect man. (I’d seen a glimmer in “Friends With Money”)

So this brings me to my question: “WHY?”

The woman works constantly. She acts, she’s got a production company, she shills for charity… Does she have a gambling addiction? Internet porn to pay for? She’s a single woman with no kids who makes double digits of MILLIONS of dollars for each movie she attaches her mug to and sends through the cookie press…so I repeat “WHY?” This, in my humble opinion, can only be a step down. Hell, the aforementioned INPC&L was a step down for Jessica Biel! By that standard, it wouldn’t just be a STEP down, but a fall from a staircase akin to the one in Georgetown where Fr. Karras lost his life in “The Exorcist.”

JA is certainly more successful in her career than I am in mine, so maybe she knows what she’s doing. *sigh* After having spewed all of that forth into the ether, I still have no idea why I care. It is a fault that I sometimes insist on trying to find rational thought and behavior where there clearly is none to be had.

I need My Daily Moment of Zen:


* clicky

Advertisements

Another rant with pictures

Clive Owen is 47 years old today. (He’s on my list. He used to be number one but that was before I fell under the spell of Gerard Butler many moons ago.) And while I wish Clive many happy returns of the day, there’s nothing remarkable about that…is there? In the youth obsessed film industry, he’s still getting work as a leading man, which is wonderful, although I am anxious to see how well say, Jennifer Aniston, now 40 but looking 30, will fare in seven years.

In “King Arthur”, he was cast opposite Keira Knightley. She was 19, he was 42 at the time of the movie’s release (which I suppose isn’t so bad considering that according to the film’s timeline, he was supposed to be playing 25.) How long before they start pairing Clive up with Hayden Panettiere? They’d better hurry up, she’s already turned twenty.

I saw “Duplicity” recently and I loved it. It was written and directed by Tony Gilroy who has penned some of the smartest films of the last few years, including Oscar nominated “Michael Clayton” which was his directorial debut. “Duplicity,” in addition to being well written, was incredibly well acted by a cast that included the wonderful Tom Wilkinson and the brilliant Paul Giamatti. It was the best movie about a sting since, well, “The Sting.” Perhaps I’m naive but I did not see the ending coming from a mile away, always a plus.

But what really stood out for me about this film was the fact that the leads, the ROMANTIC leads (Clive Owen and Julia Roberts), were both over 40. When was the last time that happened? I couldn’t tell you. I do, however, know of at least one instance where it will happen again. In 2010,when “The Bounty” with the above mentioned Aniston and Gerard Butler, who won’t technically be 40 until November of this year, but will be by the time it is released. This is, of course, a film I am very much looking forward to. And as usual, I digress.

I am wondering if this in some small way signifies a sea change, not a tsunami but perhaps a ripple, in the Hollywood machine’s thinking. While our culture as a whole, magnified to the nth degree by the movie industry, is still youth obsessed, is it possible that this is the start of a comeback for ‘Adult oriented’ (that was with a capital A, I’m not talking porn) entertainment? Are they starting to get that as the 18 yr olds who have developed a passion for the movie going experience age, that their tastes age and mature as well? That they may even have a few more bucks to spend on that passion than a teenage boy, at whom most entertainment is aimed?

“R rated” comedies did extremely well this summer, and while their content might not be considered high-brow, it should mean that there is an audience for entertainment in which nothing blows up and is not targeted squarely at the youth market. In the past, film makers have been forced to edit films, sometimes gutting the life right out of them, in order to avoid the dreaded “R”. The theory has always been you won’t get as many butts in the seats unless you dumb it down and make it palatable to a PG-13 audience.

Which brings me to my point, if I have one, that if we, as thinking adult film goers, don’t want to be spoon-fed sophomoric pablum, we have to support the mainstream releases that are not just the latest rehashing of the “Porky’s” blueprint, with OUR butts in the seats. Sure, we will occasionally seek out the little independents, like the current “Bright Star”, but we’re more likely to wait for dvd. Even big budget productions like “Duplicity” did better on dvd than in the theaters. Very often these days a movie’s real money is made in the home market, but to the powers that be, the Box Office still matters.
If we want more entertainment geared toward our demographic, we have to prove that our demographic buys tickets. To that end, I think I’ll take myself to see “The Informant” this afternoon. It’s rated R.

And now for My Daily Moment of Zen…